|
2005
Brain Trust Recommendations | Submit
Questions/Comments | Posted Comments
2005
Brain Trust Recommendations
THE
IHRC/CIDH 2005 BRAIN TRUST
The Morphing Information Age: for better
or worse?
A three-day thematic meeting prior to WSIS Phase II
convened 6-8 May 2005 as guests of the
University of California Los Angeles,
Los Angeles, California, USA
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
Being respectfully submitted chronologically to the United Nations Permanent
Forum on Indigenous Issues, the UN Working Group on Indigenous Populations,
WIPO, and the World Summit on the Information Society, Phase II
Preamble
Strongly supporting the two distinct mandates of the
United Nations Working Group on Indigenous Populations (Independent
Expert Studies with/concerning Indigenous Populations), referencing
particularly the Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples, E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/2/Add.1 (1994) Part IV, Article
19, that Indigenous Peoples have the right to participate fully,
if they so choose, at all levels of decision-making in matters which
may affect their rights, lives, and destinies, through representatives
chosen by themselves in accordance with their own procedures, as well
as to maintain and develop their own Indigenous decision-making institutions
and Article 33 that Indigenous Peoples have the right
to promote, develop and maintain their institutional structures and
their distinctive juridical customs, traditions, procedures and practices,
in accordance with internationally recognized human rights standards;
and the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
whose distinct mandate is to examine Indigenous issues within the
UN system; and
Particularly
noting and encouraged by Article 38 that Indigenous
Peoples have the right to have access to adequate financial and technical
assistance, from States and through international cooperation, to
pursue freely their political, economic, social, cultural, and spiritual
development and the for enjoyment of the rights and freedoms recognized
in this Declaration; and
Welcoming the UN General Assembly Resolution 56/183
(21 December 2001), which created the World Summit on the Information
Society; and
Emphasizing the need for active links with all the Millennium Development
Goals, highlighting in particular MDGs 1, 2,
and 3; and
Drawing attention to the importance of including the
private sector and civil society for the implementation and successful
outcomes of WSIS Phase 1 and II; and
Recognizing that WSIS and its Programmes of Action and
Recommendations will extend the positive results of the International
Year for the Culture of Peace, continue the momentum of the Decade
of Human Rights Education (see ECOSOC E/23 December 2003 Report
of the Global Forum of Indigenous Peoples and the Information Society,
para. 20.20 that Indigenous People have the right to participate
in all manner of Media and Information, Communication, Technology
in Mainstream ICT Systems, national and internationally, in order
to further strengthen our social and economic development strategies,
and para. 28.28 that Indigenous Peoples are interested in
producing multi-media education materials to assist in environmental
education, enhance and serve as a motor for the 2nd Decade
of Indigenous People and the 3rd Decade Against all Forms of Racism,
and encourage the launch of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable
Development; and
Affirming the importance of cross-UN Agency collaboration,
especially the leadership of the ITU, UNESCO, and WIPO, for the effective
implementation and monitoring of the actual achievements gained through
WSIS; especially in the area of concern expressed in the Draft
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/2/Add.1
(1994) Part IV, Article 24 that Indigenous Peoples have the
right to their traditional medicines and health practices, including
the right to the protections of vital medicinal plants, animals and
minerals, and Article 29 that Indigenous Peoples are
entitled to the recognition of the full ownership, control, and protection
of their cultural and intellectual property. They have the right to
special measures to control, develop, and protect their sciences,
technologies, and cultural manifestations, including human and other
genetic resources, seeds, medicines, knowledge of the properties of
fauna and flora, oral traditions, literatures, designs, and visual
and performing arts; and
Encouraged by the ECOSOC E/23 December 2003 Report
of the Global Forum of Indigenous Peoples and the Information Society
and the continuation of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human
Rights and the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Her Excellency,
Louise Arbours commitment to the fullest inclusion of Indigenous
Peoples in the preparation and participation for WSIS; expressing
particular concern that attention be drawn to para 36.36 which
acknowledges that precedent World Summits and Conferences utilize
the unqualified term Indigenous Peoples; and
Appreciating Her Excellencys opening session remarks
at the 2004 United Nations Working Group on Indigenous Populations,
in which she made a profound commitment to Indigenous Peoples around
the world; and
Re-affirming the central role of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, particularly noting Articles 1, 2, 7, 12,
15, 17, 18, 19, 26, and Article 27, the full International
Bill of Rights, and the Draft Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/2/Add.1 (1994) Part IV
Article 16 that states that Indigenous Peoples have the right
to have the dignity and diversity of their cultures, traditions, histories
and aspirations appropriately reflected in all forms of education
and public information; that States shall take effective measures,
in the consultation with the Indigenous Peoples concerned, to eliminate
prejudice and discrimination and to promote tolerance, understanding
and good relations among Indigenous Peoples and all segments of society,
and Article 17 that states Indigenous Peoples have
the right to establish their own media in their own languages; that
they also have the right to equal access to all forms of non-indigenous
media; that States shall take effective measures to ensure that State-owned
media duly reflects indigenous cultural diversity; and
Bearing in mind that the Draft Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/2/Add.1 (1994)
does not nullify any of the rights contained in the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights but rather particularizes the rights for Indigenous
Peoples (see DDRIP, Article 7 a, d, and e); and
Noting in particular the urgent need to respect and
promote the inherent rights and characteristics of Indigenous Peoples;
and
Holding as key to the issues of the World Summit on
the Information Society is Article 12 of the Draft Declaration
on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/2/Add.1
(1994); and
Appreciatively acknowledging the preparatory achievements
of WSIS as stated in the WSIS Information Sheet that each Phase of
the Summit marks the culmination of many years of consultations and
negotiations among Member States, UN experts, the private sector,
and non-governmental representatives, who review vast amounts of information
and share a broad spectrum of experiences in issues related to the
Information Society. These consultations and negotiations took place
prior to the Summit itself and constitute a vigorous Preparatory Process;
and
Considering the importance of the Ottawa Meeting held
14 -18 March 2005 which reads: at the Global Forum on Indigenous
Peoples and the Information Society held under the auspices of Phase
I of WSIS in December 2003, Indigenous perspectives were integrated
in the Declaration and Plan of Action and the United Nations Permanent
Forum at its Third Session in May 2004 recommended that the UN system
continue its advocacy work on Indigenous connectivity in preparation
for Phase II of WSIS, taking account of the outcomes of the Global
Forum on Indigenous Issues and the Information Society. The Permanent
Forum applauded and supported the decision taken by WSIS to establish
multi-stakeholder portals that allow communication between Indigenous
Peoples at the national level; and
Welcoming the fact that Indigenous Peoples are organizing
themselves for political, economic, social, and cultural enhancement,
and in order to bring an end to all forms of discrimination and oppression
wherever they occur, appreciates the inclusion of Indigenous Peoples
in the September 2005 Geneva Preparatory Conference via WEBcam; bearing
in mind that the first Preparatory Meeting (Prep-Com-1) of the Tunis
Phase of the World Summit on the Information Society, held in
Hammamet, 24 - 26 June 2004, confirmed that one of the three areas
of focus on the Tunis Phase will be Follow-up and implementation
of the Geneva Declaration of Principles and Plan of Action by stakeholders
at national, regional ,and international levels, with particular attention
to the challenges facing the Least Developed Countries.
This will involve a serious undertaking to take stock of the implementation
by governments and all other WSIS stakeholders of the WSIS Plan of
Action;
And finally thanking the Chairman and the Secretariats
Executive Director of the World Summit on the Information Society
who at a recent meeting in Geneva, Switzerland during the Commission
on Human Rights promised the President of IHRC/CIDH that WEBcams will
be installed and accessible in the rooms at the WSIS September Preparatory
Conference in Geneva to enable the BRAIN TRUST and others to participate
via the WEBcams internet systems.
RECOMMENDATIONS
AND SUGGESTIONS
Therefore,
the 2005 IHRC/CIDH BRAIN TRUST, held 6-8 May 2005 at the University
of California Los Angeles, respectfully offers its commitment to assist
in the implementation of the following specifically-focused Recommendations
and Suggestions which were developed by the 2005 BRAIN TRUST Focus
Groups addressing the following two topics:
TOPIC I: Indigenous Peoples and the International and Domestic
Protection of Traditional Knowledge.
The BRAIN TRUST Focus Group worked from the principle that Indigenous
Wisdom is to be honored as a great resource in the process of Indigenous
Peoples attaining their deserved respect. Encouraged by reports from
the World Intellectual Property Organization that in the previous
three years there has been an increased inclusion of Indigenous Peoples
in the WIPO decision-making process affecting Indigenous Peoples,
the TRUST recommends that Traditional Knowledge Keepers participation
be enhanced by the following recommendation:
Form A Council of Traditional Knowledge Keepers, its
numbers and representational structure to be decided by Indigenous
Peoples themselves. This Council of Traditional Knowledge Keepers
needs to ensure the ever-greater inclusion of Traditional Knowledge
Keepers in the WIPO process of protecting Intellectual Property Rights
of Indigenous Peoples. The Council of Traditional Knowledge Keepers
will be charged with the following:
1) To
document the pre-existing Intellectual Property Laws relating to Traditional
Knowledge and Knowledge held by Indigenous Peoples;
2) To develop a means to protect the Intellectual Property rights
of each and every Indigenous nation, giving recognition to their own
Intellectual Property, on their own nations terms;
3) To create a DVD (and other media) to educate Indigenous People
about their Intellectual Property rights in laypersons terms,
creating new DVDs when necessary to keep pace with the WIPO policies;
4) To organize Indigenous community leaders and Indigenous community
organizations to disseminate the DVD (and other media) at the grassroots
level;
5) To engage Indigenous Law Schools and other Indigenous educational
institutions both to assist in the educational process; and
6) To link with Indigenous Law Schools and other Indigenous educational
institutions to participate in the monitoring of Intellectual Property
Law Protections, other international laws, and their adherence; decisions
need to be made by the Indigenous nations themselves.
7) To keep apace with developing technological, monitoring means;
8) To create a cooperative of Indigenous People(s) to finance the
above activities through grassroots support;
9) To develop a mechanism for monitoring the cooperative.
TOPIC 2: National/International Mechanisms to Protect the
Lives and Responsible Freedoms of Journalists/Media/Educators, and
the Use of Internet as a Tool for Democracy or Despotism.
The BRAIN TRUST Focus Group, both as a goal for WSIS Phase II and
in the global community at large, recommends (a) the creation
of Communications Safe-Zones and (b) an Information
Communication Technology Corps.
(a) The following further suggestions have been made concerning
the establishment of Communication Safe-Zones where journalists,
news-gathers, educators, and their families have the right, as stated
in Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
to life, liberty, and security of person.
Communication
Safe-Zones
1) As
a first step, create a non-commercial, grassroots WEBsite that will
enable and expand the work of journalists. Further, that this grassroots
WEBsite can be linked to other NGOs (i.e. Media Action International,
Reporters without Borders, PEN International, etc);
2) Define the parameters of an Internet Communication Safe-Zones
to serve as portals to the WEBsite. These Safe-Zones could perhaps
be further protected by utilizing UN guidelines and other international
norms for protecting freedom of expression, especially during times
of crisis or violence;
3) Declare Communication Safe-Zones as internationally-recognized
sanctuaries for journalists, members of the media, and educators,
and their families in crisis or when under threat, to serve also as
a firstline Alert System;
4) Make available high-tech equipment, software, and use-training
to Communication Safe-Zones with concrete, practical commitments
to their equipment maintenance and software updating;
5) Reconfigure software on a regular basis to maintain the integrity
of the WEBsite, to protect against hackers and saboteurs, and to provide
for the privacy and confidentiality of the WEBsites users;
6) Provide cell phones, and cell phone service, as an additional resource,
giving access to: text messaging, instant messaging, fax, and other
evolving modalities.
7) Those using Communication Safe-Zones will agree to
abide by a style of reporting, communication, and educating, perhaps
utilizing established models like that of the Code of Ethics published
by the Society of Professional Journalists.
(b) It is suggested that a multi-stakeholder group be established
to enable and expand media literacy among educators in the use of
the Internet and related communication media via the creation of an
Information Communication Technology Training Corps;
"ITC
Training Corps"
1) This
suggestions will enable educators to turn to the Internet for vital
information materials whose access and dissemination would otherwise
be prevented. The ITC Training Corps would have within
its mandate the preservation of cultural and intercultural rights
and to promote greater respect and understanding among people.
2) Convene a number of Brain Trusts as a matter of priority, each
with a particular task:
(a) to carefully examine the implications and impact of the commodification
of Information and how it threatens and negatively affects the Freedom
of Expression of journalists, members of the media, and educators;
(b) to develop strategies to eliminate and minimize these threats;
(c) to optimize opportunities to utilize the media to promote intercultural
understanding;
(d) to utilize media to promote greater interfaith tolerance and understanding;
(e) to enhance and augment global systems and legal norms for protecting
the right to freedom of speech.
Certain other tasks were proposed by the Brain Trust to its co-participants
after general focus groups sessions, and agreed to be set in motion
for implementation:
1) PSAs To produce multi-media Public Service Announcements
(PSAs for Radio, TV, and the Internet) targeting diverse demographic
populations, encouraging individuals and the general public to participate
in achieving WSIS goals. A commitment was made to produce at least
one by the time of this Julys UN Working Group on Indigenous
Populations and perhaps additional PSAs before WSIS Phase II in Tunis
in November 2005.
2) Cultural Exchange To establish a Cultural Exchange
Organization, to facilitate a grassroots Home Stay exchange
for up to 2 months to be placed through the organizations family-based
networking.
3) Academic-based Brain Trusts To initiate and institute
High School, College, and University-based Brain Trusts to encourage
intergenerational listening and empowered inclusion of Youth through
intercultural respect and understanding.
4) ICT Equity is Good Business To encourage businesses
and business leaders to engage in the collection of new and re-cyclable
ICTs and to create the streams of distribution necessary for closing
the digital gap in its many forms. A program of ICT equity could be
included in a clear reward/recognition system for businesses that
are integrating such policies and activities in their strategies for
triple bottom-line success. It is also important to demonstrate culture-sensitive
strategies as yielding strong fiscal benefits on multiple levels for
businesses.
In closing, the seventy-four 2005 IHRC/CIDH BRAIN TRUST participants
from twelve universities, colleges and two elementary schools, sixteen
NGOs, two UN bodies, and twelve Media organizations, including radio,
television networks, internet radio, printed press and a post-production
company welcomed to the campus of the University of California Los
Angeles and linked to three other cities on two continents via WEBcam
interaction, agreed to include the further recommendation of the two
Co-Chairs:
to urge the utilization of the International Year of
and UN World Conferences, Summits each year,
as implementation engines for the goals and Plans of Action
of the World Summit on the Information Society, and for the greater
protection of the Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Traditional
Knowledge that is felt to be both an essential Human Right and a matter
of equitable respect, as well as being critical for the direction
that life itself on this planet may take.
Passed by consensus, 8 May 2005, at UCLA, Public Policy Building.
Thank you for your kind consideration of our Recommendations and Suggestions.
Please be assured of our most respectful regards and profound commitment
to assisting in the realization of these recommendations and the success
of our endeavors together for a world in which dignity for all can
exists with its longed-for consequence of global peace.
Signed by the Co-chairs on behalf of the IHRC/CIDH 2005 BRAIN TRUST,
Irene
FREDERICKS
WSIS Phase I
The Global Forum of Indigenous Peoples
and the Information Society
Prarieland Communications Systems, Inc.
Representative and Chairperson of two meetings |
Wilda
SPALDING
President, IHRC/CIDH
Sent IHRC/CIDH Delegates to
WSIS Phase I, Electronic Forum
Sending Delegates, Phase II
Linking WEBhubs to Phase II |
[top]
Submit
Questions/Comments
Please use this form to submit comments or questions. Submissions
will be reviewed and may be edited before they are posted to this site.
Comments will be posted at the sole discretion of the IHRC/CIDH staff.
|